Dissemination Plan Program Evaluation

Error. Error. This page cant be displayed. Contact support for additional information. The incident ID is 2. Chapter 3. 6. Introduction to Evaluation Section 1. A Framework for Program Evaluation A Gateway to Tools Main Section. Learn how program evaluation makes it easier for everyone involved in community health and development work to evaluate their efforts. This section is adapted from the article Recommended Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health Practice, by Bobby Milstein, Scott Wetterhall, and the CDC Evaluation Working Group. Why evaluate community health and development programs How do you evaluate a specific program A framework for program evaluation. What are some standards for good program evaluation Applying the framework Conducting optimal evaluations. Around the world, there exist many programs and interventions developed to improve conditions in local communities. Communities come together to reduce the level of violence that exists, to work for safe, affordable housing for everyone, or to help more students do well in school, to give just a few examples. But how do we know whether these programs are working If they are not effective, and even if they are, how can we improve them to make them better for local communities And finally, how can an organization make intelligent choices about which promising programs are likely to work best in their communityOver the past years, there has been a growing trend towards the better use of evaluation to understand and improve practice. The systematic use of evaluation has solved many problems and helped countless community based organizations do what they do better. Despite an increased understanding of the need for and the use of evaluation, however, a basic agreed upon framework for program evaluation has been lacking. ERPP Ecosystem Restoration Program Plan. NEEP National Experimental and Evaluation Program. Models+of+planning+for+evaluation.jpg' alt='Dissemination Plan Program Evaluation' title='Dissemination Plan Program Evaluation' />This handbook provides a framework for thinking about evaluation as a relevant and useful program tool. It was written primarily for project directors who have direct. The first step to creating an ME plan is to identify the program goals and objectives. If the program already has a logic model or theory of change, then the program. Dissemination Plan Program Evaluation' title='Dissemination Plan Program Evaluation' />In 1. United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC recognized the need to develop such a framework. As a result of this, the CDC assembled an Evaluation Working Group comprised of experts in the fields of public health and evaluation. Members were asked to develop a framework that summarizes and organizes the basic elements of program evaluation. This Community Tool Box section describes the framework resulting from the Working Groups efforts. Before we begin, however, wed like to offer some definitions of terms that we will use throughout this section. By evaluation, we mean the systematic investigation of the merit, worth, or significance of an object or effort. PediatricToolBox/CDC/ed_training/Program_Evaluation/Guide/Images/Guide_Table8.gif' alt='Dissemination Plan Program Evaluation' title='Dissemination Plan Program Evaluation' />Evaluation practice has changed dramatically during the past three decades new methods and approaches have been developed and it is now used for increasingly diverse projects and audiences. Throughout this section, the term program is used to describe the object or effort that is being evaluated. It may apply to any action with the goal of improving outcomes for whole communities, for more specific sectors e. HIVAIDS. This definition is meant to be very broad. PCORI-Framework-Dissemination-Implementation-of-PCOR.jpg' alt='Dissemination Plan Program Evaluation' title='Dissemination Plan Program Evaluation' />Examples of different types of programs include Direct service interventions e. Community mobilization efforts e. California grapes to improve the economic well being of farm workersResearch initiatives e. Surveillance systems e. Casting Call 14. Advocacy work e. Social marketing campaigns e. Third World encouraging mothers to breast feed their babies to reduce infant mortalityInfrastructure building projects e. Training programs e. Administrative systems e. Program evaluation the type of evaluation discussed in this section is an essential organizational practice for all types of community health and development work. It is a way to evaluate the specific projects and activities community groups may take part in, rather than to evaluate an entire organization or comprehensive community initiative. Stakeholders refer to those who care about the program or effort. These may include those presumed to benefit e. Key questions in thinking about stakeholders are Who cares What do they care aboutThis section presents a framework that promotes a common understanding of program evaluation. The overall goal is to make it easier for everyone involved in community health and development work to evaluate their efforts. Why evaluate community health and development programs The type of evaluation we talk about in this section can be closely tied to everyday program operations. Our emphasis is on practical, ongoing evaluation that involves program staff, community members, and other stakeholders, not just evaluation experts. This type of evaluation offers many advantages for community health and development professionals. For example, it complements program management by Helping to clarify program plans. Improving communication among partners. Gathering the feedback needed to improve and be accountable for program effectiveness. Its important to remember, too, that evaluation is not a new activity for those of us working to improve our communities. In fact, we assess the merit of our work all the time when we ask questions, consult partners, make assessments based on feedback, and then use those judgments to improve our work. When the stakes are low, this type of informal evaluation might be enough. However, when the stakes are raised when a good deal of time or money is involved, or when many people may be affected then it may make sense for your organization to use evaluation procedures that are more formal, visible, and justifiable. How do you evaluate a specific programBefore your organization starts with a program evaluation, your group should be very clear about the answers to the following questions What will be evaluated What criteria will be used to judge program performance What standards of performance on the criteria must be reached for the program to be considered successful What evidence will indicate performance on the criteria relative to the standards What conclusions about program performance are justified based on the available evidence To clarify the meaning of each, lets look at some of the answers for Drive Smart, a hypothetical program begun to stop drunk driving. What will be evaluated Drive Smart, a program focused on reducing drunk driving through public education and intervention. What criteria will be used to judge program performance The number of community residents who are familiar with the program and its goals. Customer Programming Software Cps Download there. The number of people who use Safe Rides volunteer taxis to get home. The percentage of people who report drinking and driving. The reported number of single car night time crashes This is a common way to try to determine if the number of people who drive drunk is changingWhat standards of performance on the criteria must be reached for the program to be considered successfulThe number of people who use the Safe Rides taxis will increase by 2. The percentage of people who report drinking and driving will decrease by 2. The reported number of single car night time crashes will decrease by 1. What evidence will indicate performance on the criteria relative to the standards A random telephone survey will demonstrate community residents knowledge of the program and changes in reported behavior. Logs from Safe Rides will tell how many people use their services. Information on single car night time crashes will be gathered from police records.